Get Smart — About the Environment - Golfdom
Search
Get Smart — About the Environment


Golfdom


Geoff Shackelford
For every industry member who was pleased to see Golf Digest's extensive coverage imploring greater environmental stewardship in golf, there were just as many who rolled their eyes and said, "Welcome to the party."

Or worse, a surprising number of readers heaved their magazines across the room and wrote angry letters about politicizing their beloved monthly dosage of instruction. Yep, Golf Digest was flooded with hate mail for delving into "politics," even though a close reading reveals that the magazine devoted its coverage to golf's environmental impact and future outlook. (Go to http://GolfDigest.com/editorsblog/ to read some of the vitriolic stuff the magazine received.)

There's no question that, at times, the green movement gets out of hand. And that's coming from someone who fully subscribes to doing everything we can to conserve water, preserve wildlife, protect wetlands and, in general, leave the next generation with a world in better condition than we found it. But if you read the Golf Digest package or my story on the subject in this issue (page 43) and my interview with John Barton on the Golfdom Web site, you're probably mumbling something about having had enough of the lecturing.

The modern-day environmental movement relies way too heavily on guilt to prompt people to act instead of asking simple questions such as, "Wouldn't it just be wise to do the right thing, whether or not global warming is real?"

Too much guilt and fear mongering will drive people to rebel, and that's what we saw with Golf Digest's package — even though it was well done and equitable. It did not matter what was said; a segment of the American public just doesn't want to hear it anymore. That select demographic is older, crankier and getting more selfish by the day.

The bottom line is that architects and superintendents must embrace the green movement for their own survival, and many already have. It's coming to a golf course near you. You will be expected to make it part of your business plan. Or else, they're going to start a new club committee charged with watching every move you make and monitor every chemical you administer.

In other words, embrace the movement to cut them off at the pass and ensure your place in the golf business. Make this your issue and make yourself relevant or, even better, in complete control of the situation.

That might not appeal to your senses, but I know one thing from talking to superintendents: You are conservationists at heart. You probably won't be at the next Green Peace fundraiser or handing out leaflets for the National Resources Defense Council, but as trustees of these vastly complicated environmental settings known as golf courses, you know that conservation will carry the day.

You've known this for a long time, but the conservationist label is not nearly as sexy to golfers. Yet conservation is really at the heart of the environmental movement, only minus the fear and guilt.

If you haven't already, figure out ways to be proactive on the environmental front. Perhaps you can start writing about some of your safer modern practices in the club newsletter, or you can begin a blog documenting all of the wildlife at your course.

Whether it's for your own peace of mind and sense of job security or to quiet the cranky coots who want to see the world go down in flames because they only have a couple of years left, look for ways to preach the gospel of conservation. It's what makes sense both for the health of the game and the multi-billion-dollar industry surrounding it, but also for the common good of mankind.

Wait, there I go making you feel guilty. Ah, you know what I'm saying. End of sermon.

Shackelford can be reached at
. Visit his Web site at http://www.geoffshackelford.com/.

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.
Comments from our Readers
 Posted 2008-08-16 14:15:02.0
Who could be against environmental stewardship when fortunate enough to live in a prosperous country; however, Geoff is blindly following the pack on this one. First problem - not everyone is that "prosperous". Environmentalism always costs extra. The younger gneration is spoiled and doesn't have the perspective to understand. The science, economics and reality of our current environmentalism is just absurdly flawed. Here's two examples. 17,000 golf courses have been added to our country, each course on the average has added 5,00-10,000 new, oxygen-prouducing trees. Golfers have added 125,000,000 new trees to our environment over the years. Environmentalists drink water out of plastic bottles and throw away about 100,000,000 per day in the US. We used to drink out of the drinking fountain or a glass. Plastic is difficult to recyle, even when we put it in blast furnaces which use alot of energy. The poor people can't afford environmentalism because one kilowatt hour of electricity genrated by a wind turbine generally has a total lifecycle cost of about ten times electricity generated by a coal burning generator. Environmentalism in its present state is a farce and totally unreliable. Golfers are pretty good "stewards' because, they play their game for hours outdoors and don't use any air conditioning. If we could just get our folks out of those pesky golf cars, then we might have achieved something. We used to drain swamps to get rid of insects and disease inorder to survive. Now we protect swamps and have to use chemicals to cure the diseases. Then we watch fake reality shows because we don't know what reality really is. I believe we should face up to reality, "do the math"; then apply real knowledge to a "balanced approach" to being good stewards. And "pc" environmentalists should stop turning the air conditioner down to 70 as they spend my hard earned money on costly restrictions on golf courses. I am having to pay for their guilt-trip.
Read More Comments
Make This Page Your Home Page!
Survey
Why or why didn't you go to the show this year?
I went to the show because I go most every year and my course pays for my expenses
I went to the show because I go most every year, although I paid my own way this year
I didn't go to the show this year because of my course's financial cutbacks
I never go to the show
View Results
I went to the show because I go most every year and my course pays for my expenses
8%
I went to the show because I go most every year, although I paid my own way this year
0%
I didn't go to the show this year because of my course's financial cutbacks
78%
I never go to the show
14%
View Results
Source: Golfdom,
Click here